In the last two parts of this mini series we discussed what Creation was and what Evolution was. This parts details the final conflicting ideals of the scientist to the true believer of creation.
Religious sects and scientist have been arguing points for centuries over which one is true. Scientist have had the upper hand in most cases in which they can prove their findings whereas believers cannot. But, as specified in the first part, scientists have proven some of the believers' belief in the creation of life. With religious people, they don't need proof to believe. God created everything and that's all there is to it. However, scientist don't argue whether or not God created it, they argue it's evolutionary progress.
In humans, God created us in his own image with free will, however evolution has proven that the brain evolves as it learns, so it can understand what free will is and how to use it. Evolutionists don't argue about creation, how it began or anything along those lines, they argue about what happened after that species was created.
In the long scheme of things, someone might discover which one is more true, but we may also never know. They will argue these points until someone comes up with the answer, or until the end of time, whichever comes first. Whatever you believe or don't believe, there are no wrong answers because we don't have all of the answers yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment